Comparative study of second‐line labor induction methods in patients with unfavorable cervix after first‐line low‐dose oral misoprostol

Objective The present study aimed to evaluate low‐dose oral misoprostol induction, and compare different methods used in second‐line induction in patients with a Bishop score less than 6. Methods This retrospective study analyzed the medical history and courses of pregnancy of all patients induced w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2024-10, Vol.167 (1), p.313-321
Hauptverfasser: Nace, Marie‐Cécile, Delotte, Jérôme, Gauci, Pierre‐Alexis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The present study aimed to evaluate low‐dose oral misoprostol induction, and compare different methods used in second‐line induction in patients with a Bishop score less than 6. Methods This retrospective study analyzed the medical history and courses of pregnancy of all patients induced with first‐line of low‐dose oral misoprostol (50 μg every 4 h with a total of 200 μg/24 h) from April 2021 to June 2022 in a university hospital center, and reported outcomes according to the second‐line method of induction. Results Among 437 labor inductions with low‐dose oral misoprostol, 120 patients required a second‐line induction. Predictive factors of first‐line failure were higher body mass index (P = 0.011), absence of premature rupture of membranes (P = 0.021) and earlier term of pregnancy (P 
ISSN:0020-7292
1879-3479
1879-3479
DOI:10.1002/ijgo.15552