Preoperative prediction of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma using clinical, genetic, and biochemical markers: A cohort study

Background The prevalence of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) is approximately 15%–20%. Although there are indicators to assess metastatic risks, none of them predict metastasis reliably. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a scoring system using clinical, genetic, and bi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of internal medicine 2024-07, Vol.296 (1), p.68-79
Hauptverfasser: Park, Seung Shin, Ahn, Chang Ho, Lee, Seunghoo, Lee, Woochang, Kim, Won Woong, Lee, Yu‐Mi, Kim, Su Jin, Sung, Tae‐Yon, Lee, Kyu Eun, Kim, Jung Hee, Lee, Seung Hun, Koh, Jung‐Min
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The prevalence of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) is approximately 15%–20%. Although there are indicators to assess metastatic risks, none of them predict metastasis reliably. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a scoring system using clinical, genetic, and biochemical risk factors to preoperatively predict the metastatic risk of PPGL. Methods In the cross‐sectional cohort (n = 180), clinical, genetic, and biochemical risk factors for metastasis were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a novel scoring system was developed. The scoring system was validated and compared with the age, size of tumor, extra‐adrenal location, and secretory type (ASES) score in the longitudinal cohort (n = 114). Results In the cross‐sectional cohort, pseudohypoxia group‐related gene variants (SDHB, SDHD, or VHL), methoxytyramine >0.16 nmol/L, and tumor size >6.0 cm were independently associated with metastasis after multivariate logistic regression. Using them, the gene variant, methoxytyramine, and size of tumor (GMS) score were developed. In the longitudinal cohort, Harrell's concordance index of the GMS score (0.873, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.738–0.941) was higher than that of the ASES score (0.713, 95% CI: 0.567–0.814, p = 0.007). In the longitudinal cohort, a GMS score ≥2 was significantly associated with a higher risk of metastasis (hazard ratio = 25.07, 95% CI: 5.65–111.20). A GMS score ≥2 (p 
ISSN:0954-6820
1365-2796
DOI:10.1111/joim.13791