Validation and comparison of 5th edition World Health Organization classification (WHO 2022) and International Consensus Classification proposals for MDS‐SFB31

Summary The criteria of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with mutated SFB31 (MDS‐SFB31) proposed by the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO 2022) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) need validation. We analysed 125 consecutive MDS cases with SFB31 mutation or ring sideroblasts...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of haematology 2024-09, Vol.205 (3), p.942-946
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Linlin, Li, Bing, Xu, Zefeng, Qin, Tiejun, Jia, Yujiao, Qu, Shiqiang, Zhang, Yudi, Wu, Junying, Cai, Wenyu, Pan, Lijuan, Gao, Qingyan, Jiao, Meng, Xiao, Zhijian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary The criteria of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with mutated SFB31 (MDS‐SFB31) proposed by the 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO 2022) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) need validation. We analysed 125 consecutive MDS cases with SFB31 mutation or ring sideroblasts (RS) ≥15% without excess blasts. We found that SFB31‐negative MDS with RS had significantly different clinical features and worse prognosis. According to WHO 2022, the detection of ≥15% RS may substitute for SF3B1 mutation and our analyses support this proposal for similar prognosis of two groups after excluding high‐risk genetic features referred by WHO 2022. Patients with variant allele frequency (VAF)
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/bjh.19482