Differences in glycemic trends due to reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy from the perspective of continuous glucose-monitoring

Purpose In recent years, clinicians have focused on the importance of preventing hypoglycemia. We evaluated the impact of different reconstruction procedures after proximal gastrectomy on glycemic variability in non-diabetic patients with gastric cancer. Methods This prospective observational study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Japan), 2024-09, Vol.54 (9), p.1104-1111
Hauptverfasser: Shoda, Katsutoshi, Kubota, Takeshi, Kawaguchi, Yoshihiko, Akaike, Hidenori, Maruyama, Suguru, Higuchi, Yudai, Nakayama, Takashi, Saito, Ryo, Takiguchi, Koichi, Furuya, Shinji, Shiraishi, Kensuke, Amemiya, Hidetake, Kawaida, Hiromichi, Ichikawa, Daisuke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose In recent years, clinicians have focused on the importance of preventing hypoglycemia. We evaluated the impact of different reconstruction procedures after proximal gastrectomy on glycemic variability in non-diabetic patients with gastric cancer. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2023. Flash continuous glucose-monitoring, a novel method for assessing glycemic control, was used to evaluate the glycemic profiles after gastrectomy. A flash continuous glucose-monitoring sensor was placed subcutaneously at the time of discharge, and glucose trends were evaluated for 2 weeks. Results The anastomotic methods for proximal gastrectomy were esophagogastrostomy in 10 patients and double-tract reconstruction in 10 patients. The time below this range (glucose levels 
ISSN:0941-1291
1436-2813
1436-2813
DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02845-7