Performance of medial pivot, posterior stabilized and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty based on anteroposterior stability and patient-reported outcome measures; a multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 210 knees

Background Despite advancements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10–20% of patients remain dissatisfied after surgery. Improved anteroposterior (AP) stability provided by medial pivot (MP) implants may theoretically lead to higher patient satisfaction. Methods AP stability and patient-reported outc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2024-05, Vol.144 (5), p.2327-2335
Hauptverfasser: De Groot, J. D., Brokelman, R. B.G., Lammers, P. G., Van Stralen, G. M.J., Kooijman, C. M., Hokwerda, S. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Despite advancements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10–20% of patients remain dissatisfied after surgery. Improved anteroposterior (AP) stability provided by medial pivot (MP) implants may theoretically lead to higher patient satisfaction. Methods AP stability and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at one-year postsurgery were compared between patients who underwent TKA with MP- ( n  = 121), posterior stabilized (PS; n  = 53) and rotating platform (RP; n  = 57) implants in a double-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register: NL6856, 21-02-2018). AP stability was assessed at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion using a KT-2000 arthrometer. PROMs were measured preoperative and one-year postsurgery. Results MP-TKA provided significant better AP stability at early flexion (30°) compared to PS- and RP-TKA (median [IQR]; 1.79 [1.14–2.77] mm vs. 3.31 [2.51–4.08] mm vs. 2.82 [1.80–4.03] mm, p  
ISSN:1434-3916
0936-8051
1434-3916
DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05340-3