The effect of adding real-time postural feedback in balance and mobility training in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•This is the first systematic review that focuses on the additional value of adding real-time postural feedback during balance and mobility training in older people.•Real-time postural feedback tends to have an immediate positive effect on balance and gait stability.•Low to high-quality evidence sug...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 2024-08, Vol.123, p.105439-105439, Article 105439
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Sam Guo-Shi, Fan, Eva Si-Long, Lam, Pik Kwan, Kwok, Wing Tung, Ma, Christina Zong-Hao, Lam, Freddy Man-Hin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•This is the first systematic review that focuses on the additional value of adding real-time postural feedback during balance and mobility training in older people.•Real-time postural feedback tends to have an immediate positive effect on balance and gait stability.•Low to high-quality evidence suggests that adding real-time postural feedback has no post-training effect on balance.•The post-training effects of adding real-time posture feedback on mobility outcomes are mixed. This study aimed to systematically review the additional value of providing real-time postural feedback during balance and mobility training in older people. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web-of-Science were searched from inception to August 2023. Studies comparing the effectiveness of feedback-based versus non-feedback-based postural balance or mobility training on balance or mobility outcomes were selected. Similar outcomes were pooled in meta-analyses using a random-effect model. The quality of evidence for available outcomes was rated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Eight studies were identified with 203 subjects. Two studies showed that providing postural feedback immediately improved stability in static balance and gait. For the post-training effect, however, no significant change was found in trunk movement during single-leg standing (i.e., pitch angle, MD=0.65, 95 %CI=-0.77 to 2.07, low-quality; roll angle, MD=0.96, 95 %CI=-0.87 to 2.80, moderate-quality), in the Mini-BESTest (MD=1.88, 95 %CI=-0.05 to 3.80, moderate-quality), and in balance confidence (MD=0.29, 95 %CI=-3.43 to 4.2, moderate-quality). A worsened functional reach distance was associated with providing feedback during balance training (MD=-3.26, 95 %CI=-6.31 to -0.21, high-quality). Meta-analyses on mobility outcomes were mostly insignificant, except for the trunk-roll angle of walking (MD=0.87, 95 %CI=0.05 to 1.70, low-quality) and trunk-pitch angle of walking with head-turning (MD=1.87, 95 %CI=0.95 to 2.79, moderate-quality). Adding real-time postural feedback to balance and mobility training might immediately improve stability in balance and mobility in older people. However, mixed results were reported for its post-training effect.
ISSN:0167-4943
1872-6976
DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105439