C‐peptide index at 2 h post‐meal is a useful predictor of endogenous insulin secretory capacity and withdrawal from insulin therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes

Aims To evaluate the correlation between C‐peptide index (CPI) at 2 h post‐meal and endogenous insulin secretory capacity and to develop clinical models to predict the possibility of withdrawal from insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Method This was a single‐centre retrospective study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-07, Vol.26 (7), p.2761-2773
Hauptverfasser: Iwamoto, Yuichiro, Kimura, Tomohiko, Shimoda, Masashi, Morimoto, Yuichi, Watanabe, Yuki, Itoh, Takashi, Sasaki, Taku, Mori, Shigehito, Kubo, Masato, Takenouchi, Haruka, Dan, Kazunori, Iwamoto, Hideyuki, Sanada, Junpei, Fushimi, Yoshiro, Katakura, Yukino, Nakanishi, Shuhei, Mune, Tomoatsu, Kaku, Kohei, Kaneto, Hideaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims To evaluate the correlation between C‐peptide index (CPI) at 2 h post‐meal and endogenous insulin secretory capacity and to develop clinical models to predict the possibility of withdrawal from insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Method This was a single‐centre retrospective study of patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to our hospital. Patients were divided into a withdrawal group (n = 72) and a non‐withdrawal group (n = 75) based on whether they were able to withdraw from insulin therapy at discharge, and the correlation between CPI at 2 h after meal and diabetes‐related parameters was evaluated. In addition, we created two clinical models to predict the possibility of withdrawal from insulin therapy using machine learning. Results The glycated haemoglobin values of the study participants were 87.8 ± 22.6 mmol/mo. The CPI at 2 h post‐meal was 1.93 ± 1.28 in the non‐withdrawal group and 2.97 ± 2.07 in the withdrawal group (p 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.15595