Regional conduction velocities determined by noninvasive mapping are associated with arrhythmia-free survival after atrial fibrillation ablation

Atrial arrhythmogenic substrate is a key determinant of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and reduced conduction velocities have been linked to adverse outcome. However, a noninvasive method to assess such electrophysiologic substrate is not available to date....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2024-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1570-1580
Hauptverfasser: Invers-Rubio, Eric, Hernández-Romero, Ismael, Reventos-Presmanes, Jana, Ferro, Elisenda, Guichard, Jean-Baptiste, Regany-Closa, Mariona, Pellicer-Sendra, Berta, Borras, Roger, Prat-Gonzalez, Susanna, Tolosana, Jose Maria, Porta-Sanchez, Andreu, Arbelo, Elena, Guasch, Eduard, Sitges, Marta, Brugada, Josep, Guillem, Maria S., Roca-Luque, Ivo, Climent, Andreu M., Mont, Lluís, Althoff, Till F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Atrial arrhythmogenic substrate is a key determinant of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and reduced conduction velocities have been linked to adverse outcome. However, a noninvasive method to assess such electrophysiologic substrate is not available to date. This study aimed to noninvasively assess regional conduction velocities and their association with arrhythmia-free survival after PVI. A consecutive 52 patients scheduled for AF ablation (PVI only) and 19 healthy controls were prospectively included and received electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) to noninvasively determine regional atrial conduction velocities in sinus rhythm. A novel ECGi technology obviating the need of additional computed tomography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was applied and validated by invasive mapping. Mean ECGi-determined atrial conduction velocities were significantly lower in AF patients than in healthy controls (1.45 ± 0.15 m/s vs 1.64 ± 0.15 m/s; P < .0001). Differences were particularly pronounced in a regional analysis considering only the segment with the lowest average conduction velocity in each patient (0.8 ± 0.22 m/s vs 1.08 ± 0.26 m/s; P < .0001). This average conduction velocity of the “slowest” segment was independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence and better discriminated between PVI responders and nonresponders than previously proposed predictors, including left atrial size and late gadolinium enhancement (magnetic resonance imaging). Patients without slow-conduction areas (mean conduction velocity
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.063