Allogeneic transplantation of bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors for hematological malignancies in 6064 adults from 2003 to 2020: different impacts on survival according to time period

•Using HLA-identical sibling donors, PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates for adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late period of 2015–2020.•PBSCT showed significantly faster neutrophil and platelet recovery compared with BMT, irrespective of the time period.•PBSCT showed significantly higher risks of acute and chronic GVHD compared with BMT, irrespective of the time period. Mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been widely used instead of bone marrow (BM) as the graft source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although early studies demonstrated no significant differences in survival between PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) and BM transplantation (BMT) from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling donors to adults with hematological malignancies, recent results have been unclear. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), hematopoietic recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) between PBSCT and BMT according to the time period of HCT (2003–2008, 2009–2014, or 2015–2020). We retrospectively compared the outcomes after PBSCT versus BMT in 6064 adults with hematological malignancies using a Japanese registry database between 2003 and 2020. The adjusted probability of OS was significantly higher in BMT recipients compared to PBSCT recipients during the early period of 2003–2008 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70–0.91; P < 0.001) and the middle period of 2009–2014 (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70–0.91; P < 0.001). However, during the late period of 2015–2020, the adjusted probability of OS was comparable between BMT and PBSCT recipients (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79–1.13; P = 0.564), which were mainly due to the reduction of NRM. There was no significant difference in the relapse rate between the groups, irrespective of the time period. Compared to BMT, PBSCT led to faster neutrophil and platelet recovery and the cumulative incidences of grades II–IV and grades III–IV acute and overall and extensive chronic GVHD were significantly higher in PBSCT recipients, irrespective of the time period. PBSCT and BMT had similar survival outcomes and relapse rates in adult patients with hematological malignancies during the late time period of 2015–2020 despite the hematopoietic recovery and acute and chronic GVHD being higher in PBSCT recipients in all time periods.