Does Tri‐Staple™ technology reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery? A propensity score matching analysis
Background and Objectives This study evaluates the Tri‐Staple™ technology in colorectal anastomosis. Methods Patients who underwent rectosigmoidectomy between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups: EEA™ (EEA) or Tri‐Staple™ (Tri‐EEA). The groups were matched for ag...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2024-09, Vol.130 (4), p.830-837 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Objectives
This study evaluates the Tri‐Staple™ technology in colorectal anastomosis.
Methods
Patients who underwent rectosigmoidectomy between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups: EEA™ (EEA) or Tri‐Staple™ (Tri‐EEA). The groups were matched for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and neoadjuvant radiotherapy using propensity score matching (PSM).
Result
Three hundred and thirty‐six patients were included (228 EEA; 108 Tri‐EEA). The groups were similar in sex, age, and neoadjuvant therapy. The Tri‐EEA group had fewer patients with ASA III/IV scores (7% vs. 33%; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.27650 |