Ankle and hindfoot motion of healthy adults during running revealed by dynamic biplane radiography: Side-to-side symmetry, sex-specific differences, and comparison with walking

•Healthy subjects do not demonstrate side-to-side differences in ankle and hindfoot kinematics during overground running.•Ankle and hindfoot kinematics do not differ between men and women during running.•Side-to-side differences in ankle kinematics greater than 5.6° of rotation or 3.2 mm of translat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical engineering & physics 2024-04, Vol.126, p.104151-104151, Article 104151
Hauptverfasser: Setliff, Joshua C., Paulus, Paige F., Yamamoto, Tetsuya, Yang, Shumeng, Hogan, MaCalus V., Anderst, William J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Healthy subjects do not demonstrate side-to-side differences in ankle and hindfoot kinematics during overground running.•Ankle and hindfoot kinematics do not differ between men and women during running.•Side-to-side differences in ankle kinematics greater than 5.6° of rotation or 3.2 mm of translation may represent deviation from normal variation.•Useful correlations may exist between walking and running kinematics. This study aimed to characterize ankle and hindfoot kinematics of healthy men and women during overground running using biplane radiography, and to compare these data to those previously obtained in the same cohort during overground walking. Participants ran across an elevated platform at a self-selected pace while synchronized biplane radiographs of their ankle and hindfoot were acquired. Motion of the tibia, talus, and calcaneus was tracked using a validated volumetric model-based tracking process. Tibiotalar and subtalar 6DOF kinematics were obtained. Absolute side-to-side differences in ROM and kinematics waveforms were calculated. Side-to-side and sex-specific differences were evaluated at 10 % increments of stance phase with mixed model analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between stance-phase running and walking kinematics. 20 participants comprised the study cohort (10 men, mean age 30.8 ± 6.3 years, mean BMI 24.1 ± 3.1). Average absolute side-to-side differences in running kinematics waveforms were 5.6°/2.0 mm or less at the tibiotalar joint and 5.2°/3.2 mm or less at the subtalar joint. No differences in running kinematics waveforms between sides or between men and women were detected. Correlations were stronger at the tibiotalar joint (42/66 [64 %] of correlations were p < 0.05), than at the tibiotalar joint (38/66 [58 %] of correlations were p < 0.05). These results provide a normative reference for evaluating native ankle and hindfoot kinematics which may be informative in surgical or rehabilitation contexts. Sex-specific differences in ankle kinematics during overground running are likely not clinically or etiologically significant. Associations seen between walking and running kinematics suggest one could be used to predict the other.
ISSN:1350-4533
1873-4030
DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104151