Magnetic Resonance‐Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS)‐Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor: Lesion Location and Clinical Outcomes

Background Factors predicting clinical outcomes after MR‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS)‐thalamotomy in patients with essential tremor (ET) are not well known. Objective To examine the clinical outcomes and their relationship with patients' baseline demographic and clinical features and lesi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Movement disorders 2024-06, Vol.39 (6), p.1015-1025
Hauptverfasser: Arcadi, Alana, Aviles‐Olmos, Iciar, Gonzalez‐Quarante, Lain Hermes, Gorospe, Arantza, Jiménez‐Huete, Adolfo, Corte, Marta Macías, Parras, Olga, Martin‐Bastida, Antonio, Riverol, Mario, Villino, Rafael, Guridi, Jorge, Rodríguez‐Oroz, Maria C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Factors predicting clinical outcomes after MR‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS)‐thalamotomy in patients with essential tremor (ET) are not well known. Objective To examine the clinical outcomes and their relationship with patients' baseline demographic and clinical features and lesion characteristics at 6‐month follow‐up in ET patients. Methods A total of 127 patients were prospectively evaluated at 1 (n = 122), 3 (n = 102), and 6 months (n = 78) after MRgFUS‐thalamotomy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained at 6 months (n = 60). Primary outcomes included: (1) change in the Clinical Rating Scale of Tremor (CRST)‐A+B score in the treated hand and (2) frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in all subitems of the CRST scale in the treated hand, CRST‐C, axial tremor (face, head, voice, tongue), AEs, and correlation of primary outcomes at 6 months with lesion characteristics. Statistical analysis included linear mixed, standard, and logistic regression models. Results Scores for CRST‐A+B, CRST‐A, CRST‐B in the treated hand, CRST‐C, and axial tremor were improved at each evaluation (P 
ISSN:0885-3185
1531-8257
1531-8257
DOI:10.1002/mds.29801