MRI-based monitoring of prostate cancer after HIFU: Inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score

•Need for standardized monitoring methodology after focal prostate treatment.•Clinical application of MRI-based PI-FAB score for follow-up after HIFU treatment.•High specificity and NPV in detecting post-HIFU residual/recurrent prostate cancer.•Potential of PI-FAB score in supporting non-invasive po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2024-06, Vol.175, p.111463-111463, Article 111463
Hauptverfasser: Pausch, Antonia M., Elsner, Clara, Rupp, Niels J., Eberli, Daniel, Hötker, Andreas M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Need for standardized monitoring methodology after focal prostate treatment.•Clinical application of MRI-based PI-FAB score for follow-up after HIFU treatment.•High specificity and NPV in detecting post-HIFU residual/recurrent prostate cancer.•Potential of PI-FAB score in supporting non-invasive post-HIFU patient monitoring. To investigate inter-reader agreement, and diagnostic performance of the Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB) score applied to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in patients who underwent focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy for localized prostate cancer. In this retrospective, IRB-approved, single-center study, 73 men, who underwent focal HIFU treatment and received follow-up mpMRIs with subsequent prostate biopsies, were included. The PI-FAB score was applied to follow-up MRIs at 6, 12, and 36 months post-HIFU by two radiologists with different experience levels. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Gwet’s AC1, and the diagnostic performance of the PI-FAB score was assessed in relation to histopathologic results of subsequent prostate biopsies for each reader. PI-FAB scores showed substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement (AC1: 0.80–0.95) and demonstrated high specificity (Reader 1: 90–98 %, Reader 2: 87–98 %) and NPVs (Reader 1: 91–100 %, Reader 2: 88–97 %) in ruling out residual or recurrent in-field prostate cancer post-HIFU. Sensitivity (Reader 1: ≥43 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) and PPVs (Reader 1: ≥33 %, Reader 2: ≥14 %) were mostly relatively lower, with notable disparities between the two readers, indicating the potential influence of radiologist experience. The PI-FAB score provides a consistent and reliable tool for post-HIFU monitoring of prostate cancer using mpMRI. It demonstrates substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement and is particularly effective in excluding in-field residual or recurrent prostate cancer post-HIFU treatment. Its application can potentially enhance post-treatment patient care, emphasizing its value as a non-invasive MRI-based monitoring approach after focal ablative therapy of the prostate.
ISSN:0720-048X
1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111463