Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic performance between 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to compare the detection rates of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer. A systematic search of major medical databases was conducted to identify studies up to September 2023. The primary outcome assessed was the detection rate of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Abdominal imaging 2024-09, Vol.49 (9), p.3166-3174
Hauptverfasser: Zhuang, Zixuan, Zhang, Yang, Yang, Xuyang, Deng, Xiangbing, Wang, Ziqiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to compare the detection rates of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer. A systematic search of major medical databases was conducted to identify studies up to September 2023. The primary outcome assessed was the detection rate of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the primary tumor. Pooled risk ratios with a 95% CI were calculated using random-effect models to adjust for heterogeneity. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT has higher uptakes in lymph nodes, bone, and peritoneal metastasis compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT. The detection rate of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT based on lesion was better for lymph node metastasis (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.47–0.84, P  = 0.002) and peritoneal metastasis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.32–0.85, P  = 0.009), both imaging modalities had essentially the same diagnostic efficacy in primary tumor (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96–1.02, P  = 0.49). 68 Ga-FAPI-04 as a highly promising PET/CT tracer was superior to 18 F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer, especially in detecting lymph node metastases and peritoneal metastases.
ISSN:2366-0058
2366-004X
2366-0058
DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04266-z