Serum bicarbonate levels and kidney outcomes in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study

Background The interplay between serum bicarbonate levels and kidney outcomes is not fully understood. We conducted a prospective cohort study in three intensive care units (ICUs) to evaluate the association of serum bicarbonate levels with acute kidney injury (AKI) and kidney function recovery in c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2024-09, Vol.56 (9), p.2983-2989
Hauptverfasser: Ribeiro, Heitor S., Duarte, Marvery P., Burdmann, Emmanuel A., Ferreira, Aparecido P., Inda-Filho, Antônio J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The interplay between serum bicarbonate levels and kidney outcomes is not fully understood. We conducted a prospective cohort study in three intensive care units (ICUs) to evaluate the association of serum bicarbonate levels with acute kidney injury (AKI) and kidney function recovery in critically ill patients. Methods A prospective cohort study in three intensive care units (ICUs) was performed. The serum bicarbonate level in the first 24 h after ICU admission was categorized as low ( 26 mEq/L). Serum creatinine (SCr) levels according to the KDIGO AKI guideline were used for defining AKI within the first 7 days of ICU stay. At ICU admission, SCr ≥ 1.1 for women and ≥ 1.3 mg/dL for men were indicative of impaired kidney function. Mortality outcome was tracked up to 28 days, and kidney function recovery was assessed at hospital discharge. Results A total of 2732 patients (66 ± 19 years and 55% men) were analyzed, with 32% having impaired kidney function at ICU admission. Overall, 26% of patients had low bicarbonate levels, while 32% had high bicarbonate levels. Notably, patients with preserved kidney function showed a lower prevalence of low bicarbonate levels compared to those with impaired kidney function (20% vs. 39%, p  
ISSN:1573-2584
0301-1623
1573-2584
DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04029-1