Development and perception of surgery‐specific goals of care discussions in the preoperative setting: A learning pilot

Background Goals of care discussions are infrequently documented in the preoperative period. Furthermore, documentation does not consistently address what matters most to patients, although patient values (PV) are central to person‐centered care. Methods A multidisciplinary working group was formed....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2024-06, Vol.129 (7), p.1384-1389
Hauptverfasser: Letica‐Kriegel, Allison S., Rosen, Roni, McNeil, Nita, Thompson, Errika, James, Monique, Broach, Vance, Roche, Kara Long, Riportella, Michaela, Ng, Susan, Bernal, Camila, Vaynrub, Max, Downey, Robert, Voigt, Louis, Epstein, Andrew S., Nelson, Judith, Goldfrank, Deborah, Nash, Garrett M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Goals of care discussions are infrequently documented in the preoperative period. Furthermore, documentation does not consistently address what matters most to patients, although patient values (PV) are central to person‐centered care. Methods A multidisciplinary working group was formed. An electronic note comprised of (1) topics of discussion, (2) PV, and (3) advance care planning (ACP), was created and embedded into existing note templates for Gynecologic Surgical Oncology. Surgeons and advanced practice providers (APPs) were educated to conduct and document these conversations in preoperative clinic for patients undergoing cancer surgery for a pilot period. Data were collected regarding usage of the template. Focus groups with surgeons, APPs, and patients were conducted. Qualitative analysis was performed on transcripts. Results During the pilot, 7 surgeon/APP teams utilized the template on a total of 55 notes. Average number of notes completed per surgeon was 7.8 (SD 8.5). Forty‐six notes (84%) included topics of discussion, 15 (27%) included PV, 4 (7%) included ACP. Qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts revealed that clinicians and patients perceived the initiative to be useful and important, although implementation barriers were identified. Conclusion Creating a surgery‐specific GOC template is feasible. Iterative revisions are needed to increase utility in clinic workflows.
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.27632