Validation of case-ascertainment algorithms using health administrative data to identify people who inject drugs in Ontario, Canada

Health administrative data can be used to improve the health of people who inject drugs by informing public health surveillance and program planning, monitoring, and evaluation. However, methodological gaps in the use of these data persist due to challenges in accurately identifying injection drug u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2024-06, Vol.170, p.111332, Article 111332
Hauptverfasser: Greenwald, Zoë R., Werb, Dan, Feld, Jordan J., Austin, Peter C., Fridman, Daniel, Bayoumi, Ahmed M., Gomes, Tara, Kendall, Claire E., Lapointe-Shaw, Lauren, Scheim, Ayden I., Bartlett, Sofia R., Benchimol, Eric I., Bouck, Zachary, Boucher, Lisa M., Greenaway, Christina, Janjua, Naveed Z., Leece, Pamela, Wong, William W.L., Sander, Beate, Kwong, Jeffrey C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Health administrative data can be used to improve the health of people who inject drugs by informing public health surveillance and program planning, monitoring, and evaluation. However, methodological gaps in the use of these data persist due to challenges in accurately identifying injection drug use (IDU) at the population level. In this study, we validated case-ascertainment algorithms for identifying people who inject drugs using health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Data from cohorts of people with recent (past 12 months) IDU, including those participating in community-based research studies or seeking drug treatment, were linked to health administrative data in Ontario from 1992 to 2020. We assessed the validity of algorithms to identify IDU over varying look-back periods (ie, all years of data [1992 onwards] or within the past 1–5 years), including inpatient and outpatient physician billing claims for drug use, emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations for drug use or injection-related infections, and opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Algorithms were validated using data from 15,241 people with recent IDU (918 in community cohorts and 14,323 seeking drug treatment). An algorithm consisting of ≥1 physician visit, ED visit, or hospitalization for drug use, or OAT record could effectively identify IDU history (91.6% sensitivity and 94.2% specificity) and recent IDU (using 3-year look back: 80.4% sensitivity, 99% specificity) among community cohorts. Algorithms were generally more sensitive among people who inject drugs seeking drug treatment. Validated algorithms using health administrative data performed well in identifying people who inject drugs. Despite their high sensitivity and specificity, the positive predictive value of these algorithms will vary depending on the underlying prevalence of IDU in the population in which they are applied. •Health administrative data can support research among people who inject drugs.•Validated algorithms have high sensitivity and specificity to identify injecting history and recent injecting.•Accuracy of algorithms to identify injecting will vary by population group.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111332