Creep feed grinding of gamma titanium aluminide and burn resistant titanium alloys using SiC abrasive

Following a brief introduction to titanium alloys and their machinability, the cutting performance of a gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic ( γ-TiAl) alloy: Ti–45Al–8Nb–0.2C wt% and a burn resistant titanium (BuRTi) alloy: Ti–25V–15Cr–2Al–0.2C wt%, is compared with creep feed grinding using SiC a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of machine tools & manufacture 2007-07, Vol.47 (9), p.1486-1492
Hauptverfasser: Hood, R., Lechner, F., Aspinwall, D.K., Voice, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Following a brief introduction to titanium alloys and their machinability, the cutting performance of a gamma titanium aluminide intermetallic ( γ-TiAl) alloy: Ti–45Al–8Nb–0.2C wt% and a burn resistant titanium (BuRTi) alloy: Ti–25V–15Cr–2Al–0.2C wt%, is compared with creep feed grinding using SiC abrasive. The work utilised 2 separate L9 Taguchi fractional factorial arrays. Typically G-ratios were a factor of ∼10× greater for γ-TiAl than BuRTi, with on average ∼10% lower maximum power and ∼25% lower maximum specific energy for the γ-TiAl alloy. A combination of a moderately high wheel speed: 35 m/s, low depth of cut: 1.25 mm and low feed rate: 150 mm/min, produced the lowest average workpiece surface roughness (Ra∼1.4 μm). Workpiece surface integrity evaluation indicated that with lower operating parameter levels, in particular a wheel speed of 15 m/s, surfaces free of burn and cracks could be produced, while at higher wheel speeds: 35 m/s, extensive workpiece surface burn was evident, with the γ-TiAl alloy suffering extensive cracking. Microhardness measurements showed in some instances slightly increased workpiece surface hardness of around 50–60HK 0.025 for the BuRTi alloy and 200HK 0.025 for the γ-TiAl material over respective bulk hardness values of 375HK 0.025 and 400HK 0.025.
ISSN:0890-6955
1879-2170
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.10.008