Entertainment Licensing
Evidence presented at court proved the employee livestreamed the fight at the bar for the benefit of paying patrons without first purchasing a commercial license. Because JHP exclusively owned rights to distribute and display the fight and the employee livestreamed the fight at the bar without purch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Licensing journal 2024-03, Vol.44 (3), p.22-23 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Evidence presented at court proved the employee livestreamed the fight at the bar for the benefit of paying patrons without first purchasing a commercial license. Because JHP exclusively owned rights to distribute and display the fight and the employee livestreamed the fight at the bar without purchasing a commercial license the employee was liable for copyright infringement. [...]the court determined whether the business owner had an obvious and direct financial interest in the infringement. In some instances, courts have found no vicarious liability for copyright infringement where a business rents space on a fixed rental fee that does not depend on the nature of the activity of the lessee because there is no direct financial benefit from the copyright infringement. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1040-4023 |