Efficacy of the traction method for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial (with videos)
To overcome the technical difficulties associated with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a novel traction device that can alter the direction of traction was developed. This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional ESD versus those of traction-assisted gastric ESD. Patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2024-08, Vol.100 (2), p.307-311.e2 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To overcome the technical difficulties associated with gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a novel traction device that can alter the direction of traction was developed. This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional ESD versus those of traction-assisted gastric ESD.
Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm were randomized to receive conventional (n = 75) or traction-assisted (n = 73) gastric ESD. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time.
There were no differences between the conventional and traction-assisted groups with respect to treatment results or adverse events. The mean procedure time was similar for both groups (78.9 vs 88.3 minutes, respectively; P = .3); however, times for the traction device tended to be shorter for lesions in the lesser curvature of the upper or middle stomach (84.6 vs 123.2 minutes; P = .057).
Traction-assisted ESD for lesions in the lesser curvature of the upper or middle stomach were shorter, thereby reducing the procedure time of conventional ESD. (Clinical trial registration: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, identifier 000044450.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0016-5107 1097-6779 1097-6779 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.018 |