Daily Grass and Alfalfa-Reference Evapotranspiration Estimates and Alfalfa-to-Grass Evapotranspiration Ratios in Florida

Efficient use of natural water resources in agriculture is becoming an important issue in Florida because of the rapid depletion of freshwater resources due to the increasing trend of industrial development and population. Reliable and consistent estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) are a key element of managing water resources efficiently. Since the 1940s numerous grass- and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration (ETo and ETr, respectively) equations have been developed and used by researchers and decision makers, resulting in confusion as to which equation to select as the most accurate reference ET estimates. Twenty-one ETo and ETr methods were evaluated based on their daily performance in a humid climate. The Food and Agriculture Organization Penman-Monteith (FAO56-PM) equation was used as the basis for comparison for the other methods. Measured and carefully screened daily climate data during a 23-year period (1978-2000) were used for method performance analyses, in which the methods were ranked based on the standard error of estimate (SEE) on a daily basis. In addition, the performance of the four alfalfa-based ET (ETr) equations and the ratio of alfalfa ET to grass ET (Kr values) were evaluated, which have not been studied before in Florida's humid climatic conditions. The peak month ETo estimates by each method were also evaluated. All methods produced significantly different ETo estimates than the FAO56-PM method. The 1948 Penman method estimates were closest to the FAO56-PM method on a daily basis throughout the year, with the daily SEE averaging 0.11 mm⋅d−1; thus this method was ranked the second best overall. Although 1963 Penman (with the original wind function) slightly overestimated ET, especially at high ETo rates, it provided remarkably good estimates as well and ranked as the third best method, with a daily average SEE value of 0.14 mm⋅d−1. Both methods produced peak month ETo estimates closest to the FAO56-PM method among all methods evaluated, with daily peak month SEEs averaging 0.07 and 0.09 mm⋅d−1, respectively. Significant variations were observed in terms of the performance of the various forms of Penman's equations. For example, the original Penman-Monteith method produced the poorest ETo estimates among the combination equations, with a daily SEE for all months and peak month averaging 0.50 and 0.35 mm⋅d−1, respectively and ranked 11th. An average value of 1.18 was used to convert ETr estimates to ETo values for alfalfa-reference m