Deep learning-based multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) nomogram for predicting Ki-67 expression in rectal cancer
Purpose To explore the value of deep learning-based multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) nomogram in predicting the Ki-67 expression in rectal cancer. Methods The data of 491 patients with rectal cancer from two centers were retrospectively analyzed and divided into training, interna...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Abdominal imaging 2024-09, Vol.49 (9), p.3003-3014 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To explore the value of deep learning-based multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) nomogram in predicting the Ki-67 expression in rectal cancer.
Methods
The data of 491 patients with rectal cancer from two centers were retrospectively analyzed and divided into training, internal validation, and external validation sets. They were categorized into high- and low-expression group based on postoperative pathological Ki-67 expression. Each patient’s mp-MRI data were analyzed to extract and select the most relevant features of deep learning, and a deep learning model was constructed. Independent predictive risk factors were identified and incorporated into a clinical model, and the clinical and deep learning models were combined to obtain a nomogram for the prediction of Ki-67 expression. The performance characteristics of the DL-model, clinical model, and nomogram were assessed using ROCs, calibration curve, decision curve, and clinical impact curve analysis.
Results
The strongest deep learning features were extracted and screened from mp-MRI data. Two independent predictive factors, namely Magnetic Resonance Imaging T (mrT) staging and differentiation degree, were identified through clinical feature selection. Three models were constructed: a deep learning (DL)-model, a clinical model, and a nomogram. The AUCs of clinical model in the training, internal validation, and external validation set were 0.69, 0.78, and 0.67, respectively. The AUCs of the deep model and nomogram ranged from 0.88 to 0.98. The prediction performance of the deep learning model and nomogram was significantly better than the clinical model (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2366-0058 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-024-04232-9 |