Genetics providers’ perspectives on the use of digital tools in clinical practice

Digital tools are increasingly incorporated into genetics practice to address challenges with the current model of care. Yet, genetics providers’ perspectives on digital tool use are not well characterized. Genetics providers across Canada were recruited. Semistructured interviews were conducted to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics in medicine 2024-06, Vol.26 (6), p.101122, Article 101122
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Whiwon, Hirjikaka, Daena, Grewal, Sonya, Shaw, Angela, Luca, Stephanie, Clausen, Marc, Bombard, Yvonne, Hayeems, Robin Z., Aronson, Melyssa, Bernier, Francois, Brudno, Michael, Carroll, June C., Chad, Lauren, Cohn, Ronald, Costain, Gregory, Dhalla, Irfan, Faghfoury, Hanna, Friedman, Jan, Hewson, Stacy, Jamieson, Trevor, Jobling, Rebekah, Kodida, Rita, Laberge, Anne-Marie, Lerner-Ellis, Jordan, Liston, Eriskay, Mamdani, Muhammad, Marshall, Christian R., Osmond, Matthew, Pham, Quynh, Reble, Emma, Rudzicz, Frank, Seto, Emily, Shastri-Estrada, Serena, Shuman, Cheryl, Silver, Josh, Smith, Maureen, Thorpe, Kevin, Ungar, Wendy J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Digital tools are increasingly incorporated into genetics practice to address challenges with the current model of care. Yet, genetics providers’ perspectives on digital tool use are not well characterized. Genetics providers across Canada were recruited. Semistructured interviews were conducted to ascertain their perspectives on digital tool use and the clinical practice factors that might inform digital tool integration. A qualitative interpretive description approach was used for analysis. Thirty-three genetics providers across 5 provinces were interviewed. Participants had favorable attitudes toward digital tool use. They were open to using digital tools in the pretest phase of the genetic testing pathway and for some posttest tasks or in a hybrid model of care. Participants expressed that digital tools could enhance efficiency and allow providers to spend more time practicing at the top of scope. Providers also described the need for careful consideration of the potential impact of digitalization on the clinician-patient dynamic, access to and equity of care, and unintended digital burden on providers. Genetics providers considered digital tools to represent a viable solution for improving access, efficiency, and quality of care in genetics practice. Successful use of digital tools in practice will require careful consideration of their potential unintended impacts.
ISSN:1098-3600
1530-0366
1530-0366
DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101122