Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infection in pregnancy: A systematic review of international guidelines
Background Mycoplasma genitalium is an emerging pathogen, which has been linked to cervicitis, urethritis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). With the advent of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels for sexually transmitted infections, it is increasingly being identified in pregnant wo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2024-07, Vol.166 (1), p.27-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Mycoplasma genitalium is an emerging pathogen, which has been linked to cervicitis, urethritis and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). With the advent of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels for sexually transmitted infections, it is increasingly being identified in pregnant women.
Objectives
The aim was to review international guidelines, which had explicit recommendations for treatment of M. genitalium infection in pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Search Strategy
PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were reviewed with no age, species, language or date restrictions.
Selection Criteria
Studies were included if they had an explicit recommendation for treatment of M. genitalium in pregnancy. Studies were excluded if there was no recommendation in pregnancy, if they referred to other international guideline recommendations or were historical versions of guidelines.
Data Collection and Analysis
References were manually reviewed and 50 papers were selected for review. Only four guidelines were included in the final analysis and they were from Europe, UK, Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.
Main Results
All studies recommended azithromycin as first‐line treatment, and advised against moxifloxacin use. The dosing schedule of azithromycin, varied between guidelines, as did the utility/safety of pristinamycin for macrolide resistant infections. Safety data was generally reassuring for azithromycin but inconsistent for pristinamycin.
Conclusions
Azithromycin is the first‐line treatment for macrolide susceptible or unknown resistance infections, but there is a lack of consistency regarding dosing of azithromycin or the utility/safety of pristinamycin for macrolide resistant infections in pregnancy/lactation.
Synopsis
While international guidelines recommend azithromycin as first‐line treatment for M. genitalium infections in pregnancy, there are inconsistencies around second‐line treatment options and azithromycin dosing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-7292 1879-3479 1879-3479 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ijgo.15469 |