Evolut PRO and SAPIEN ULTRA Performance in Small Aortic Annuli: The OPERA-TAVI Registry
The performance of latest iteration transcatheter aortic valve replacement platforms in patients with small aortic anatomy remains underexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and performance between the self-expanding (SE) Evolut PRO and PRO+ and the balloon-expandable (BE) SA...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2024-03, Vol.17 (5), p.681-692 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The performance of latest iteration transcatheter aortic valve replacement platforms in patients with small aortic anatomy remains underexplored.
The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness and performance between the self-expanding (SE) Evolut PRO and PRO+ and the balloon-expandable (BE) SAPIEN ULTRA in patients with small aortic annuli.
Data from the OPERA-TAVI (Comparative Analysis of Evolut PRO vs. SAPIEN 3 ULTRA Valves for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) registry were used, with 1:1 propensity score matching. Primary endpoints included 1-year effectiveness composite (all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or heart failure hospitalization) and 30-day device-related (hemodynamic structural valve dysfunction and nonstructural valve dysfunction) outcomes.
Among 3,516 patients, 251 matched pairs with aortic annular area 20 mm Hg (SE 1.0% vs BE 13.5%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1876-7605 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.006 |