Journals must expand access to peer review data

Empirical studies on peer review bias are primarily conducted by people from privileged groups and with affiliations with the journals studied. Data access is one major barrier to conducting peer review research. Accordingly, we propose pathways to broaden access to peer review data to people from m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2024-04, Vol.39 (4), p.311-314
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Olivia M., Davis, Kayla L., Waterman, Robin, Pizza, Riley B., Mack, Caitlin, Conway, Emily E., Dobson, Kara C., Foster, Brianna, Hristova, Ani E., Jarvey, Julie C., Nourn, Nan, Davis, Courtney L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Empirical studies on peer review bias are primarily conducted by people from privileged groups and with affiliations with the journals studied. Data access is one major barrier to conducting peer review research. Accordingly, we propose pathways to broaden access to peer review data to people from more diverse backgrounds. Empirical studies on peer review bias are primarily conducted by people from privileged groups and with affiliations with the journals studied. Data access is one major barrier to conducting peer review research. Accordingly, we propose pathways to broaden access to peer review data to people from more diverse backgrounds.
ISSN:0169-5347
1872-8383
DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2024.02.003