A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Unmet Social Needs and Clinical Outcomes Among Adults with Diabetes

Background Adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes often face financial challenges and other unmet social needs to effective diabetes self-management. Objective Whether a digital intervention focused on addressing socioeconomic determinants of health improves diabetes clinical outcomes more than usual...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2024-10, Vol.39 (13), p.2415-2424
Hauptverfasser: Patel, Minal R., Zhang, Guanghao, Heisler, Michele, Piette, John D., Resnicow, Kenneth, Choe, Hae-Mi, Shi, Xu, Song, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes often face financial challenges and other unmet social needs to effective diabetes self-management. Objective Whether a digital intervention focused on addressing socioeconomic determinants of health improves diabetes clinical outcomes more than usual care. Design Randomized trial from 2019 to 2023. Participants A total of 600 adults with diabetes, HbA1c ≥ 7.5%, and self-reported unmet social needs or financial burden from a health system and randomized to the intervention or standard care. Intervention CareAvenue is an automated, e-health intervention with eight videos that address unmet social needs contributing to poor outcomes. Measures Primary outcome was HbA1c, measured at baseline, and 6 and 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes included systolic blood pressure and reported met social needs, cost-related non-adherence (CRN), and financial burden. We examined main effects and variation in effects across predefined subgroups. Results Seventy-eight percent of CareAvenue participants completed one or more modules of the website. At 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in HbA1c changes between CareAvenue and control group ( p  = 0.24). There were also no significant between-group differences in systolic blood pressure ( p  = 0.29), met social needs ( p  = 0.25), CRN ( p  = 0.18), and perceived financial burden ( p  = 0.31). In subgroup analyses, participants with household incomes 100–400% FPL (1.93 (SE = 0.76), p  
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08708-8