Children teach sensational information—as long as it is true

•Four- and 5-year-olds prefer to teach sensational over neutral information.•When accuracy and sensationalism conflict, 4- and 5-year-olds prefer to teach what is true, regardless of the information’s sensational value.•Preschoolers actively weigh their preferences for accuracy and sensationalism and counter their bias for sensationalism when veracity is at stake. When sharing information, teenagers and adults prioritize what is sensational or attention-grabbing, sometimes at the cost of the truth. Nothing is known so far about whether young children prefer to transmit sensational information or what they prioritize when the sensational quality of information conflicts with its truth. In two experiments (N = 136), 4- and 5-year-olds engaged in a forced-choice task in which they selected one of two statements to teach to a peer. In the absence of explicit truth value assignments, children of both ages preferred teaching sensational information over non-sensational (neutral) information (p < .0001). When information was sensational but untrue, truth trumped sensationalism in both age groups (p < .0001). The experiments shed more light on biases that affect the early ontogeny of information exchange. Not only do children prioritize certain kinds of information when teaching, they also actively weigh these preferences against one another and mute their bias for sensationalism when veracity is at stake.