Comparison of Three Airway Maneuvers of Jaw Thrust, Two-Handed E-C Technique With Head in Neutral Position, and Two-Handed E-C Technique With Head Fully Extended: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study

Background Bag-mask ventilation is an essential life-saving skill. The E-C technique of mask holding is the most popular. In patients with suspected cervical injury, the jaw thrust maneuver is recommended instead of the E-C technique with head tilt-chin lift. Should jaw thrust fail to produce adequate chest rise, the operator is advised to switch to the E-C technique with the head tilt-chin lift maneuver with head extension as it is vital to move oxygen into the lungs. We hypothesized that the E-C clamp with the head in the neutral position without head tilt might permit adequate ventilation without producing excessive movement of the cervical spine, which in turn might translate as less strain to the cervical spine. Methods In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study, we evaluated the relative efficacy of three airway maneuvers in opening the airway in anesthetized and paralyzed adults: jaw thrust, two-handed E-C technique with head in the neutral position, and two-handed E-C technique with head fully extended. The tidal volume generated during mechanical ventilation using these three techniques was considered as the primary outcome. Seventy-two subjects were recruited for this trial and all three techniques of mask holding were performed in each of these subjects in a sequence as dictated by a randomization table. Results The jaw thrust technique provided a mean tidal volume significantly higher than the two-handed E-C technique, with the head in the neutral position (p