Single-channel qEEG characteristics distinguish delirium from no delirium, but not postoperative from non-postoperative delirium

•Our random forest quantitative EEG (qEEG) classifier could classify delirium versus no delirium with an AUC of 0.76.•The most important delirium classification features were: theta peak frequency, relative alpha power and theta autocorrelation.•There was no evidence that qEEG features differed betw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurophysiology 2024-05, Vol.161, p.93-100
Hauptverfasser: Lodema, D.Y., Ditzel, F.L., Hut, S.C.A., van Dellen, E., Otte, W.M., Slooter, A.J.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Our random forest quantitative EEG (qEEG) classifier could classify delirium versus no delirium with an AUC of 0.76.•The most important delirium classification features were: theta peak frequency, relative alpha power and theta autocorrelation.•There was no evidence that qEEG features differed between postoperative and non-postoperative delirium. This exploratory study examined quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) changes in delirium and the use of qEEG features to distinguish postoperative from non-postoperative delirium. This project was part of the DeltaStudy, a cross-sectional,multicenterstudy in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and non-ICU wards. Single-channel (Fp2-Pz) four-minutes resting-state EEG was analyzed in 456 patients. After calculating 98 qEEG features per epoch, random forest (RF) classification was used to analyze qEEG changes in delirium and to test whether postoperative and non-postoperative delirium could be distinguished. An area under the receiver operatingcharacteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.71–0.80) was found when classifying delirium with a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.63 at the optimal operating point. The classification of postoperative versus non-postoperative delirium resulted in an AUC of 0.50 (95%CI 0.38–0.61). RF classification was able to discriminate delirium from no delirium with reasonable accuracy, while also identifying new delirium qEEG markers like autocorrelation and theta peak frequency. RF classification could not distinguish postoperative from non-postoperative delirium. Single-channel EEG differentiates between delirium and no delirium with reasonable accuracy. We found no distinct EEG profile for postoperative delirium, which may suggest that delirium is one entity, whether it develops postoperatively or not.
ISSN:1388-2457
1872-8952
DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2024.01.009