Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Guided Insulin Administration in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial

To evaluate the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) in adjusting insulin therapy in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Prospective randomized clinical trial. Insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) admitted to LTCF. Participants in the standard of care wore a blin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2024-05, Vol.25 (5), p.884-888
Hauptverfasser: Idrees, Thaer, Castro-Revoredo, Iris A., Oh, Hyungseok D., Gavaller, Monica D., Zabala, Zohyra, Moreno, Emmelin, Moazzami, Bobak, Galindo, Rodolfo J., Vellanki, Priyathama, Cabb, Elena, Johnson, Theodore M., Peng, Limin, Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) in adjusting insulin therapy in long-term care facilities (LTCF). Prospective randomized clinical trial. Insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) admitted to LTCF. Participants in the standard of care wore a blinded CGM with treatment adjusted based on point-of-care capillary glucose results before meals and bedtime (POC group). Participants in the intervention (CGM group) wore a Dexcom G6 CGM with treatment adjusted based on daily CGM profile. Treatment adjustment was performed by the LTCF medical team, with a duration of intervention up to 60 days. The primary endpoint was difference in time in range (TIR 70-180 mg/dL) between treatment groups. Among 100 participants (age 74.73 ± 11 years, 80% admitted for subacute rehabilitation and 20% for nursing home care), there were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics between groups, and CGM data were compared for a median of 17 days. There were no differences in TIR (53.38% ± 30.16% vs 48.81% ± 28.03%, P = .40), mean daily mean CGM glucose (184.10 ± 43.4 mg/dL vs 190.0 ± 45.82 mg/dL, P = .71), or the percentage of time below range (TBR)
ISSN:1525-8610
1538-9375
1538-9375
DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.031