Pharmacological prevention and treatment of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

•Scientific evidence on prevention and treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in cancer patients is limited.•Naldemedine and magnesium oxide are most likely effective for the prevention of OIC in cancer patients.•Oxycodone/naloxone, naldemedine and methylnaltrexone are effective for the trea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer treatment reviews 2024-04, Vol.125, p.102704, Article 102704
Hauptverfasser: Kistemaker, K.R.J., Sijani, F., Brinkman, D.J., de Graeff, A., Burchell, G.L., Steegers, M.A.H., van Zuylen, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Scientific evidence on prevention and treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in cancer patients is limited.•Naldemedine and magnesium oxide are most likely effective for the prevention of OIC in cancer patients.•Oxycodone/naloxone, naldemedine and methylnaltrexone are effective for the treatment of OIC in cancer patients.•Further studies comparing standard laxatives with each other and with opioid antagonists should be conducted before recommendations for clinical practice can be made. Cancer-related pain often requires opioid treatment with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) as its most frequent gastrointestinal side-effect. Both for prevention and treatment of OIC osmotic (e.g. polyethylene glycol) and stimulant (e.g. bisacodyl) laxatives are widely used. Newer drugs such as the peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) and naloxone in a fixed combination with oxycodone have become available for the management of OIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to give an overview of the scientific evidence on pharmacological strategies for the prevention and treatment of OIC in cancer patients. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was completed from inception up to 22 October 2022. Randomized and non-randomized studies were systematically selected. Bowel function and adverse drug events were assessed. Twenty trials (prevention: five RCTs and three cohort studies; treatment: ten RCTs and two comparative cohort studies) were included in the review. Regarding the prevention of OIC, three RCTs compared laxatives with other laxatives, finding no clear differences in effectivity of the laxatives used. One cohort study showed a significant benefit of magnesium oxide compared with no laxative. One RCT found a significant benefit for the PAMORA naldemedine compared with magnesium oxide. Preventive use of oxycodone/naloxone did not show a significant difference in two out of three other studies compared to oxycodone or fentanyl. A meta-analysis was not possible. Regarding the treatment of OIC, two RCTs compared laxatives, of which one RCT found that polyethylene glycol was significantly more effective than sennosides. Seven studies compared an opioid antagonist (naloxone, methylnaltrexone or naldemedine) with placebo and three studies compared different dosages of opioid antagonists. These studies with opioid antagonists were used for the meta-analysis. Oxycodone/naloxone showed a significant i
ISSN:0305-7372
1532-1967
1532-1967
DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102704