Retrospective Follow-up Assessment of Risk Variables Influencing the Outcome of Autologous Tooth Transplantation
This retrospective study aimed to identify which patient-, donor tooth–, recipient site–, and surgical procedure–related variables may influence the outcome of tooth autotransplantation. The sample included 128 autotransplants performed in 122 patients. Single-visit clinical/imaging examinations wer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2024-06, Vol.50 (6), p.747-757 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This retrospective study aimed to identify which patient-, donor tooth–, recipient site–, and surgical procedure–related variables may influence the outcome of tooth autotransplantation.
The sample included 128 autotransplants performed in 122 patients. Single-visit clinical/imaging examinations were used to define the outcome as successful, survival, or failure. The association of potential indicators with the survival or failure categories was analyzed individually and adjusted for confounders through multivariate logistic regression models.
After a follow-up period of 1 to 30.11 years, success was achieved in 71.8% of autotransplants, whereas the survival and failure groups had rates of 14.1% each, and the grouped success/survival rate reached 85.9%. An extraoral time >15 minutes and difficult handling/placement were strong/independent risk covariates for survival and failure categories (odds ratio >1, P 1, P .05).
Based on the results of this study, unerupted/partially erupted status of the donor tooth, surgical extraction, total extraoral time >15 minutes, deficient recipient’s bone level, difficult handling/placement of the autotransplant, poor initial stability, and lack of prophylactic antibiotics during the surgical procedure must be considered with caution when performing autotransplantation because of their deleterious influence on the outcome. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.joen.2024.02.021 |