Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IMPORTANCE: Rapid tests for respiratory viruses, including multiplex panels, are increasingly available in emergency departments (EDs). Their association with patient outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine if ED rapid respiratory virus testing in patients with suspected acute respiratory...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of internal medicine (1960) 2024-05, Vol.184 (5), p.528-536
Hauptverfasser: Schober, Tilmann, Wong, Kimberly, DeLisle, Gaëlle, Caya, Chelsea, Brendish, Nathan J, Clark, Tristan W, Dendukuri, Nandini, Doan, Quynh, Fontela, Patricia S, Gore, Genevieve C, Li, Patricia, McGeer, Allison J, Noël, Kim Chloe, Robinson, Joan L, Suarthana, Eva, Papenburg, Jesse
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 536
container_issue 5
container_start_page 528
container_title Archives of internal medicine (1960)
container_volume 184
creator Schober, Tilmann
Wong, Kimberly
DeLisle, Gaëlle
Caya, Chelsea
Brendish, Nathan J
Clark, Tristan W
Dendukuri, Nandini
Doan, Quynh
Fontela, Patricia S
Gore, Genevieve C
Li, Patricia
McGeer, Allison J
Noël, Kim Chloe
Robinson, Joan L
Suarthana, Eva
Papenburg, Jesse
description IMPORTANCE: Rapid tests for respiratory viruses, including multiplex panels, are increasingly available in emergency departments (EDs). Their association with patient outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine if ED rapid respiratory virus testing in patients with suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI) was associated with decreased antibiotic use, ancillary tests, ED length of stay, and ED return visits and hospitalization and increased influenza antiviral treatment. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science from 1985 to November 14, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials of patients of any age with ARI in an ED. The primary intervention was rapid viral testing. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers (T.S. and K.W.) extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, version 2.0. Estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Antibiotic use and secondary outcomes were pooled separately as risk ratios (RRs) and risk difference estimates with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Of 7157 studies identified, 11 (0.2%; n = 6068 patients) were included in pooled analyses. Routine rapid viral testing was not associated with antibiotic use (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; high certainty) but was associated with higher use of influenza antivirals (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; moderate certainty) and lower use of chest radiography (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; moderate certainty) and blood tests (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; moderate certainty). There was no association with urine testing (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17; low certainty), ED length of stay (0 hours; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.16; moderate certainty), return visits (RR, 0.93; 95%, CI 0.79-1.08; moderate certainty) or hospitalization (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08; high certainty). Adults represented 963 participants (16%). There was no association of viral testing with antibiotic use in any prespecified subgroup by age, test method, publication date, number of viral targets, risk of bias, or industry funding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there are limited benefits of routine viral testing in EDs for patients with ARI. Further st
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2937338041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2815816</ama_id><sourcerecordid>2937338041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a221t-f47d9cfcbcd4fabcfb592a4c16afaad0e11cee7f538c6939801801df2a3119643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpaEKSP9BDK-ilF2_0Yct2b8s2SQspgTTtVczKo6DFll1JTvG_r5ZNAs0gGME88zLwEPKRsxVnjF_sYADnEwY_YLcSTJQrxmT9hpwIrppCcV6-ffkzdUzOY9yxXA1jpZTvyLFsSqnaip-QtOmddwZ6ejsnMw4Y6WjpHUyuo3cYJxcgjWGhv12YI73HmJx_oM7TywHDA3qz0K84QUgD-hS_0DX9ucSEAyRncsCjw78UfEd_YIJi7aFfootn5MhCH_H8qZ-SX1eX95tvxc3t9ffN-qYAIXgqbFl3rbFma7rSwtbYbdUKKA1XYAE6hpwbxNpWsjGqlW3DeH6dFSA5b1UpT8nnQ-4Uxj9zvl0PLhrse_A4zlGLVtZSNqzkGf30Ct2Nc8j3Ri2ZknVbVUplqj5QJowxBrR6Cm6AsGjO9N6N_s-N3rvRezd588NT_rzdT573nk1k4P0ByAEvU9HwquFK_gN-zpgM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3063795566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>American Medical Association Current</source><creator>Schober, Tilmann ; Wong, Kimberly ; DeLisle, Gaëlle ; Caya, Chelsea ; Brendish, Nathan J ; Clark, Tristan W ; Dendukuri, Nandini ; Doan, Quynh ; Fontela, Patricia S ; Gore, Genevieve C ; Li, Patricia ; McGeer, Allison J ; Noël, Kim Chloe ; Robinson, Joan L ; Suarthana, Eva ; Papenburg, Jesse</creator><creatorcontrib>Schober, Tilmann ; Wong, Kimberly ; DeLisle, Gaëlle ; Caya, Chelsea ; Brendish, Nathan J ; Clark, Tristan W ; Dendukuri, Nandini ; Doan, Quynh ; Fontela, Patricia S ; Gore, Genevieve C ; Li, Patricia ; McGeer, Allison J ; Noël, Kim Chloe ; Robinson, Joan L ; Suarthana, Eva ; Papenburg, Jesse</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Rapid tests for respiratory viruses, including multiplex panels, are increasingly available in emergency departments (EDs). Their association with patient outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine if ED rapid respiratory virus testing in patients with suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI) was associated with decreased antibiotic use, ancillary tests, ED length of stay, and ED return visits and hospitalization and increased influenza antiviral treatment. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science from 1985 to November 14, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials of patients of any age with ARI in an ED. The primary intervention was rapid viral testing. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers (T.S. and K.W.) extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, version 2.0. Estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Antibiotic use and secondary outcomes were pooled separately as risk ratios (RRs) and risk difference estimates with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Of 7157 studies identified, 11 (0.2%; n = 6068 patients) were included in pooled analyses. Routine rapid viral testing was not associated with antibiotic use (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; high certainty) but was associated with higher use of influenza antivirals (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; moderate certainty) and lower use of chest radiography (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; moderate certainty) and blood tests (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; moderate certainty). There was no association with urine testing (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17; low certainty), ED length of stay (0 hours; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.16; moderate certainty), return visits (RR, 0.93; 95%, CI 0.79-1.08; moderate certainty) or hospitalization (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08; high certainty). Adults represented 963 participants (16%). There was no association of viral testing with antibiotic use in any prespecified subgroup by age, test method, publication date, number of viral targets, risk of bias, or industry funding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there are limited benefits of routine viral testing in EDs for patients with ARI. Further studies in adults, especially those with high-risk conditions, are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38436951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adults ; Antibiotics ; Antiviral drugs ; Clinical outcomes ; Emergency medical care ; Hospitalization ; Influenza ; Length of stay ; Meta-analysis ; Pediatrics ; Respiratory diseases ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2024-05, Vol.184 (5), p.528-536</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Medical Association May 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a221t-f47d9cfcbcd4fabcfb592a4c16afaad0e11cee7f538c6939801801df2a3119643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,776,780,3327,27901,27902,76458,76461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38436951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schober, Tilmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLisle, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caya, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendish, Nathan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Tristan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendukuri, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Quynh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontela, Patricia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gore, Genevieve C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGeer, Allison J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noël, Kim Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarthana, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papenburg, Jesse</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Archives of internal medicine (1960)</title><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Rapid tests for respiratory viruses, including multiplex panels, are increasingly available in emergency departments (EDs). Their association with patient outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine if ED rapid respiratory virus testing in patients with suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI) was associated with decreased antibiotic use, ancillary tests, ED length of stay, and ED return visits and hospitalization and increased influenza antiviral treatment. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science from 1985 to November 14, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials of patients of any age with ARI in an ED. The primary intervention was rapid viral testing. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers (T.S. and K.W.) extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, version 2.0. Estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Antibiotic use and secondary outcomes were pooled separately as risk ratios (RRs) and risk difference estimates with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Of 7157 studies identified, 11 (0.2%; n = 6068 patients) were included in pooled analyses. Routine rapid viral testing was not associated with antibiotic use (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; high certainty) but was associated with higher use of influenza antivirals (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; moderate certainty) and lower use of chest radiography (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; moderate certainty) and blood tests (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; moderate certainty). There was no association with urine testing (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17; low certainty), ED length of stay (0 hours; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.16; moderate certainty), return visits (RR, 0.93; 95%, CI 0.79-1.08; moderate certainty) or hospitalization (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08; high certainty). Adults represented 963 participants (16%). There was no association of viral testing with antibiotic use in any prespecified subgroup by age, test method, publication date, number of viral targets, risk of bias, or industry funding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there are limited benefits of routine viral testing in EDs for patients with ARI. Further studies in adults, especially those with high-risk conditions, are warranted.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiviral drugs</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2168-6106</issn><issn>2168-6114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpaEKSP9BDK-ilF2_0Yct2b8s2SQspgTTtVczKo6DFll1JTvG_r5ZNAs0gGME88zLwEPKRsxVnjF_sYADnEwY_YLcSTJQrxmT9hpwIrppCcV6-ffkzdUzOY9yxXA1jpZTvyLFsSqnaip-QtOmddwZ6ejsnMw4Y6WjpHUyuo3cYJxcgjWGhv12YI73HmJx_oM7TywHDA3qz0K84QUgD-hS_0DX9ucSEAyRncsCjw78UfEd_YIJi7aFfootn5MhCH_H8qZ-SX1eX95tvxc3t9ffN-qYAIXgqbFl3rbFma7rSwtbYbdUKKA1XYAE6hpwbxNpWsjGqlW3DeH6dFSA5b1UpT8nnQ-4Uxj9zvl0PLhrse_A4zlGLVtZSNqzkGf30Ct2Nc8j3Ri2ZknVbVUplqj5QJowxBrR6Cm6AsGjO9N6N_s-N3rvRezd588NT_rzdT573nk1k4P0ByAEvU9HwquFK_gN-zpgM</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Schober, Tilmann</creator><creator>Wong, Kimberly</creator><creator>DeLisle, Gaëlle</creator><creator>Caya, Chelsea</creator><creator>Brendish, Nathan J</creator><creator>Clark, Tristan W</creator><creator>Dendukuri, Nandini</creator><creator>Doan, Quynh</creator><creator>Fontela, Patricia S</creator><creator>Gore, Genevieve C</creator><creator>Li, Patricia</creator><creator>McGeer, Allison J</creator><creator>Noël, Kim Chloe</creator><creator>Robinson, Joan L</creator><creator>Suarthana, Eva</creator><creator>Papenburg, Jesse</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Schober, Tilmann ; Wong, Kimberly ; DeLisle, Gaëlle ; Caya, Chelsea ; Brendish, Nathan J ; Clark, Tristan W ; Dendukuri, Nandini ; Doan, Quynh ; Fontela, Patricia S ; Gore, Genevieve C ; Li, Patricia ; McGeer, Allison J ; Noël, Kim Chloe ; Robinson, Joan L ; Suarthana, Eva ; Papenburg, Jesse</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a221t-f47d9cfcbcd4fabcfb592a4c16afaad0e11cee7f538c6939801801df2a3119643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiviral drugs</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schober, Tilmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLisle, Gaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caya, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendish, Nathan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Tristan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendukuri, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doan, Quynh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontela, Patricia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gore, Genevieve C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGeer, Allison J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noël, Kim Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suarthana, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papenburg, Jesse</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of internal medicine (1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schober, Tilmann</au><au>Wong, Kimberly</au><au>DeLisle, Gaëlle</au><au>Caya, Chelsea</au><au>Brendish, Nathan J</au><au>Clark, Tristan W</au><au>Dendukuri, Nandini</au><au>Doan, Quynh</au><au>Fontela, Patricia S</au><au>Gore, Genevieve C</au><au>Li, Patricia</au><au>McGeer, Allison J</au><au>Noël, Kim Chloe</au><au>Robinson, Joan L</au><au>Suarthana, Eva</au><au>Papenburg, Jesse</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of internal medicine (1960)</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>184</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>528</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>528-536</pages><issn>2168-6106</issn><eissn>2168-6114</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Rapid tests for respiratory viruses, including multiplex panels, are increasingly available in emergency departments (EDs). Their association with patient outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine if ED rapid respiratory virus testing in patients with suspected acute respiratory infection (ARI) was associated with decreased antibiotic use, ancillary tests, ED length of stay, and ED return visits and hospitalization and increased influenza antiviral treatment. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science from 1985 to November 14, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials of patients of any age with ARI in an ED. The primary intervention was rapid viral testing. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers (T.S. and K.W.) extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias, version 2.0. Estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Antibiotic use and secondary outcomes were pooled separately as risk ratios (RRs) and risk difference estimates with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Of 7157 studies identified, 11 (0.2%; n = 6068 patients) were included in pooled analyses. Routine rapid viral testing was not associated with antibiotic use (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05; high certainty) but was associated with higher use of influenza antivirals (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75; moderate certainty) and lower use of chest radiography (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.98; moderate certainty) and blood tests (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97; moderate certainty). There was no association with urine testing (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17; low certainty), ED length of stay (0 hours; 95% CI, −0.17 to 0.16; moderate certainty), return visits (RR, 0.93; 95%, CI 0.79-1.08; moderate certainty) or hospitalization (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.08; high certainty). Adults represented 963 participants (16%). There was no association of viral testing with antibiotic use in any prespecified subgroup by age, test method, publication date, number of viral targets, risk of bias, or industry funding. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that there are limited benefits of routine viral testing in EDs for patients with ARI. Further studies in adults, especially those with high-risk conditions, are warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>38436951</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6106
ispartof Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2024-05, Vol.184 (5), p.528-536
issn 2168-6106
2168-6114
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2937338041
source American Medical Association Current
subjects Adults
Antibiotics
Antiviral drugs
Clinical outcomes
Emergency medical care
Hospitalization
Influenza
Length of stay
Meta-analysis
Pediatrics
Respiratory diseases
Systematic review
title Clinical Outcomes of Rapid Respiratory Virus Testing in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T19%3A37%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Outcomes%20of%20Rapid%20Respiratory%20Virus%20Testing%20in%20Emergency%20Departments:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20internal%20medicine%20(1960)&rft.au=Schober,%20Tilmann&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=184&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=528&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=528-536&rft.issn=2168-6106&rft.eissn=2168-6114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2937338041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3063795566&rft_id=info:pmid/38436951&rft_ama_id=2815816&rfr_iscdi=true