Effects of Biventricular Pacing Locations on Anti-Tachycardia Pacing Success in a Patient-Specific Model

Patients with drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) often undergo implantation of a cardiac defibrillator (ICD). While life-saving, shock from an ICD can be traumatic. To combat the need for defibrillation, ICDs come equipped with low-energy pacing protocols. These anti-tachycardia pacing (AT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Paccione, Eric N, Lange, Matthias, Orkild, Benjamin A, Bergquist, Jake A, Kwan, Eugene, Hunt, Bram, Dosdall, Derek, Macleod, Rob S, Ranjan, Ravi
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Patients with drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) often undergo implantation of a cardiac defibrillator (ICD). While life-saving, shock from an ICD can be traumatic. To combat the need for defibrillation, ICDs come equipped with low-energy pacing protocols. These anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) methods are conventionally delivered from a lead inserted at the apex of the right ventricle (RV) with limited success. Recent studies have shown the promise of biventricular leads placed in the left ventricle (LV) for ATP delivery. This study tested the hypothesis that stimulating ATP from multiple biventricular locations will improve termination rates in a patient-specific computational model. VT was first induced in the model, followed by ATP delivery from 1-4 biventricular stimulus sites. We found that combining stimulation sites does not alter termination success so long as a critical stimulus site is included. Combining the RV stimulus site with any combination of LV sites did not affect ATP success except for one case. Including the RV site may allow biventricular ATP to be a robust approach across different scar distributions without affecting the efficacy of other stimulation sites. Combining sites may increase the likelihood of including a critical stimulus site when such information cannot be ascertained.
ISSN:2325-8861
2325-887X
DOI:10.22489/CinC.2023.369