Evaluation of CLINITEST® Rapid Covid-19 + Influenza antigen test in a cohort of symptomatic patients in an emergency department

Objectives Rapid management of patients with respiratory tract infections in hospital emergency departments is one of the main objectives since the concurrent circulation of respiratory viruses following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The use of new combined point-of-care antigen tests for detecting influ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2024-05, Vol.43 (5), p.853-861
Hauptverfasser: Maldonado-Barrueco, Alfredo, Gutiérrez-Arroyo, Almudena, Bloise, Iván, de Ceano-Vivas, María, Rivera-Nuñez, Angélica, Santos-Olmos, Rosario Torres, Vega, Dolores Montero, García-Rodríguez, Julio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Rapid management of patients with respiratory tract infections in hospital emergency departments is one of the main objectives since the concurrent circulation of respiratory viruses following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The use of new combined point-of-care antigen tests for detecting influenza A/B and SARS-CoV-2 represents an advantage in response time over the molecular tests. The objective was to evaluate the suitability of the CLINITEST® Rapid Covid-19 + Influenza Antigen test (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) (RCIA test) by measuring the sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa, and cut-off values. Methods Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from a randomised group of symptomatic patients of all ages at emergency department during January–February 2023. In parallel, these patients were screened for influenza A/B, and SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR. The Ct (cycle threshold) values were collected for positive [RT-PCR (+) /RCIA test (+)] and false negative [(RT-PCR (+) /RCIA test (-)] samples. A subanalysis was performed in the paediatric population ( 20). Despite its good specificity and Cohen’s kappa value, its use as a screening test is not comparable to RT-PCR systems in the ED environment with a high number of false negative results.
ISSN:0934-9723
1435-4373
DOI:10.1007/s10096-024-04788-w