Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

In this randomized trial in patients with low-risk cervical cancer, simple hysterectomy was not inferior to radical hysterectomy with respect to 3-year pelvic recurrence and was associated with a lower risk of urologic complications.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2024-02, Vol.390 (9), p.819-829
Hauptverfasser: Plante, Marie, Kwon, Janice S., Ferguson, Sarah, Samouëlian, Vanessa, Ferron, Gwenael, Maulard, Amandine, de Kroon, Cor, Van Driel, Willemien, Tidy, John, Williamson, Karin, Mahner, Sven, Kommoss, Stefan, Goffin, Frederic, Tamussino, Karl, Eyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur, Kim, Jae-Weon, Gleeson, Noreen, Brotto, Lori, Tu, Dongsheng, Shepherd, Lois E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this randomized trial in patients with low-risk cervical cancer, simple hysterectomy was not inferior to radical hysterectomy with respect to 3-year pelvic recurrence and was associated with a lower risk of urologic complications.
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2308900