Common Bile Duct Injury in Cholecystectomy

Dickens critiques the study by Kalata et al on common bile duct injury(CBDI) in Medicare patients from 2010 through 2019. This retrospective, claims-based research can provide meaningful insight despite the many limitations of such an inquiry. The authors found a higher rate of CBDI with robotic-ass...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2024-05, Vol.159 (5), p.591-592
1. Verfasser: Dickens, Eugene O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dickens critiques the study by Kalata et al on common bile duct injury(CBDI) in Medicare patients from 2010 through 2019. This retrospective, claims-based research can provide meaningful insight despite the many limitations of such an inquiry. The authors found a higher rate of CBDI with robotic-assisted cholecystectomy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. They concluded that robotic-assisted cholecystectomy should be reconsidered to prevent unnecessary harm. In response, Kalata et al comment that they are glad that this study has stimulated important discussions within the surgical community around the role of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy.
ISSN:2168-6254
2168-6262
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8083