A computer-aided polyp detection system in screening and surveillance colonoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem trial

Studies on the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) in a daily clinical screening and surveillance colonoscopy population practice are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel CAD system in a screening and surveillance colonoscopy population. This multicentre, randomised, controlled...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet. Digital health 2024-03, Vol.6 (3), p.e157-e165
Hauptverfasser: Maas, Michiel H J, Neumann, Helmut, Shirin, Haim, Katz, Lior H, Benson, Ariel A, Kahloon, Arslan, Soons, Elsa, Hazzan, Rawi, Landsman, Marc J, Lebwohl, Benjamin, Lewis, Suzanne K, Sivanathan, Visvakanth, Ngamruengphong, Saowanee, Jacob, Harold, Siersema, Peter D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Studies on the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) in a daily clinical screening and surveillance colonoscopy population practice are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel CAD system in a screening and surveillance colonoscopy population. This multicentre, randomised, controlled trial was done in ten hospitals in Europe, the USA, and Israel by 31 endoscopists. Patients referred for non-immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) screening or surveillance colonoscopy were included. Patients were randomomly assigned to CAD-assisted colonoscopy or conventional colonoscopy; a subset was further randomly assigned to undergo tandem colonoscopy: CAD followed by conventional colonoscopy or conventional colonoscopy followed by CAD. Primary objectives included adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) and adenoma per extraction (APE). Secondary objectives included adenoma miss rate (AMR) in the tandem colonoscopies. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04640792. A total of 916 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 449 in the CAD group and 467 in the conventional colonoscopy group. APC was higher with CAD compared with conventional colonoscopy (0·70 vs 0·51, p=0·015; 314 adenomas per 449 colonoscopies vs 238 adenomas per 467 colonoscopies; poisson effect ratio 1·372 [95% CI 1·068–1·769]), while showing non-inferiority of APE compared with conventional colonoscopy (0·59 vs 0·66; p
ISSN:2589-7500
2589-7500
DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00242-X