The bevel effect: a prospective, randomized investigation into needle design in dental intraligamentary anesthesia
Objectives This in vivo study aimed to assess the impact of needle bevel design on puncture pain, anesthetic success, and mechanical deformations in intraligamentary injection (ILA) cases, comparing a short triple facet cut (STF) to a triple lancet cut (TL) after single or repetitive use. Materials...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral investigations 2024-02, Vol.28 (3), p.170-170, Article 170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
This in vivo study aimed to assess the impact of needle bevel design on puncture pain, anesthetic success, and mechanical deformations in intraligamentary injection (ILA) cases, comparing a short triple facet cut (STF) to a triple lancet cut (TL) after single or repetitive use.
Materials and methods
In a prospective single-blind trial, 200 ILA needles (STF,
n
= 100; TL,
n
= 100) were randomly assigned for dental procedures. Patients received ILA either with STF or TL needles, used once (group A;
n
= 50 each) or repeatedly (group B;
n
= 50). Puncture pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS). Anesthetic success was determined via cold spray (yes/no), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyzed needle tip deformations.
Results
Puncture pain did not significantly differ between STF and TL, regardless of needle use or injection area. Success rates were comparable in single use (82% STF vs. 79% TL;
p
> 0.05). For repetitive use, STF exhibited a significantly higher success rate (80% vs. 69%;
p
= 0.012). Mechanical deformations were prevalent in 97.5% of needles, with TL showing greater deformations than STF after single and repeated uses. Barbs were more common in TL (90/100) than STF (84/100), with a higher relative risk for barbed-like deformation in TL (RR single use: 1.26;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1436-3771 1432-6981 1436-3771 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-024-05546-0 |