Bleb vessel density as a predictive factor for surgical revisions after Preserflo Microshunt implantation

Purpose Bleb failure is a common complication after glaucoma filtration surgery. Different bleb classification schemes incorporating filtration bleb vascularization have been proposed, but the reported correlation with intraocular pressure (IOP) has been variable, possibly because of subjective vasc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2024-08, Vol.102 (5), p.e797-e804
Hauptverfasser: Schneider, Sophie, Kallab, Martin, Murauer, Olivia, Reisinger, Anna‐Sophie, Strohmaier, Susanne, Huang, Alex S., Bolz, Matthias, Strohmaier, Clemens A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Bleb failure is a common complication after glaucoma filtration surgery. Different bleb classification schemes incorporating filtration bleb vascularization have been proposed, but the reported correlation with intraocular pressure (IOP) has been variable, possibly because of subjective vascularization grading. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate bleb vascularization after Preserflo Microshunt (PM) implantation using anterior segment OCT‐angiography (AS‐OCTA) as a biomarker for bleb failure. Methods Twenty‐three eyes of twenty‐three patients underwent PM implantation. Up to 12 months after surgery PM scleral passage‐centred AS‐OCTA measurements (PLEX Elite 9000) for bleb‐vessel density (BVD) determination were performed and IOP as well as necessity for surgical revisions (needling and open revision) were documented. After multi‐step image analysis (region of interest definition, artefact removal, binarization, BVD calculation), the predictive value of early postoperative BVD for surgical revisions was assessed using logistic regression modelling. Results Baseline IOP (23.57 ± 7.75 mmHg) decreased significantly to 8.30 ± 2.12, 9.17 ± 2.33 and 11.70 ± 4.40 mmHg after 1, 2 and 4 week(s), and 13.48 ± 5.83, 11.87 ± 4.49, 12.30 ± 6.65, 11.87 ± 3.11 and 13.05 ± 4.12 mmHg after 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 month(s), respectively (p 
ISSN:1755-375X
1755-3768
1755-3768
DOI:10.1111/aos.16642