Safety and Efficacy of Insulins in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Enteral Nutrition

There is a relative lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of hyperglycemia in patients receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN), with or without a diagnosis of diabetes. This retrospective study examined 475 patients (303 with known diabetes) hospitalized in critical care setting uni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine practice 2024-04, Vol.30 (4), p.367-371
Hauptverfasser: Ni, Kevin, Hawkins, R. Matthew, Smyth, Heather L., Seggelke, Stacey A., Gibbs, Joanna, Lindsay, Mark C., Kaizer, Laura K., Low Wang, Cecilia C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There is a relative lack of consensus regarding the optimal management of hyperglycemia in patients receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN), with or without a diagnosis of diabetes. This retrospective study examined 475 patients (303 with known diabetes) hospitalized in critical care setting units in 2019 in a single center who received continuous EN. Rates of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and glucose levels within the target range (70-180 mg/dL) were compared between patients with and without diabetes, and among patients treated with intermediate-acting (IA) biphasic neutral protamine Hagedorn 70/30, long-acting (LA) insulin, or rapid-acting insulin only. Among those with type 2 diabetes mellitus, IA and LA insulin regimens were associated with a significantly higher proportion of patient-days in the target glucose range and fewer hyperglycemic days. Level 1 (
ISSN:1530-891X
1934-2403
DOI:10.1016/j.eprac.2024.01.009