Impact of carbohydrate quantity and quality on maternal and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the impact of carbohydrate quantity and quality on maternal and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. Using a pre-defined search strategy, two researchers systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, and PubMed for randomized controlled trials comparing low-carbohydrate,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews 2024-01, Vol.18 (1), p.102941-102941, Article 102941
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Martin Ming Him, Yuen-Man Chan, Mandy, Ng, Tsoi Pan, Louie, Jimmy Chun Yu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the impact of carbohydrate quantity and quality on maternal and pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. Using a pre-defined search strategy, two researchers systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, and PubMed for randomized controlled trials comparing low-carbohydrate, low-glycaemic index, or low-glycaemic load diets with usual care in gestational diabetes mellitus. Mean differences and risk ratios were extracted. Thirteen studies with 877 participants were included. Low-carbohydrate diet did not significantly differ from usual care for fasting blood glucose (3 studies; mean difference: 1.60 mmol/L; 95 % confidence interval: −1.95, 5.15), insulin requirement (2 studies; risk ratio: 1.01; 95 % confidence interval: 0.31, 3.05), birthweight (4 studies; mean difference: −0.23 kg; 95 % confidence interval: −1.90, 1.45), caesarean delivery (5 studies; risk ratio: 1.11; 95 % confidence interval: 0.66, 1.85), macrosomia (3 studies; risk ratio: 0.35; 95 % confidence interval: 0.00, 2130.64), large-for-gestational-age (2 studies; risk ratio: 0.46; 95 % confidence interval: 0.03, 7.20), and small-for-gestational-age infants (2 studies; risk ratio: 0.94; 95 % confidence interval: 0.00, 231.18). Low-glycaemic index diet did not significantly differ from usual care for the above outcomes either. However, low-glycaemic load diet reduced macrosomia risk (2 studies; risk ratio: 0.51; 95 % confidence interval: 0.43, 0.59). Low-carbohydrate and low-glycaemic index diets do not differ from usual care for most maternal and foetal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. But low-glycaemic load diet may reduce macrosomia risk. •Gestational diabetes is common in pregnancy, but optimal carbohydrate intake remains uncertain.•We reviewed impact of carbohydrate quantity and quality on maternal, fetal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus.•Low-carbohydrate and low-glycaemic index diets similar to usual care; low-glycaemic load diet may reduce macrosomia.•Larger randomised controlled trials with better compliance measures, reporting guidelines needed for robust evidence.
ISSN:1871-4021
1878-0334
DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102941