A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of a Laminin‐5 fragment contained soothing cream in post‐laser treatment care

Background Photothermolysis effect, resulting from laser procedures, can cause redness/erythema, skin irritation and burning sensation, these symptoms may persist more than several days after the procedure and leading to discomfort for patients. Proper management is necessary for the better outcome,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2024-06, Vol.23 (6), p.2084-2089
Hauptverfasser: Khan, Galina, Cho, Junyoung, Cha, Han Gyu, Choi, Yean Su, Park, Eun Soo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Photothermolysis effect, resulting from laser procedures, can cause redness/erythema, skin irritation and burning sensation, these symptoms may persist more than several days after the procedure and leading to discomfort for patients. Proper management is necessary for the better outcome, especially in early period after the laser procedure. Laminin‐5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®), is believed to have the calming/soothing effect on overheated/irritated skin after undergoing the laser treatment. It is assumed that cream can help alleviate the redness, erythema and burning sensation commonly experienced after laser treatments. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Laminin‐5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®) during the early post‐laser care period. Materials and Methods This prospective split‐face study involved 28 patients who underwent CO2 laser procedures and met inclusion criteria. The laser treatment was performed on both sides of the midface, and subsequently, the Laminin‐5 fragment contained soothing cream (CEBELIA Extreme Care®) was applied to one side of the midface. The efficacy of the cream was evaluated through objective measures, including photographic evaluation by two independent evaluators and assessment using an automatic skin analysis device. Subjective evaluations were also conducted. Results The objective evaluation, based on the erythema score, revealed a statistical significant difference (p 
ISSN:1473-2130
1473-2165
DOI:10.1111/jocd.16222