The Evaluation of Gastric Emptying Using the 13 C-Acetate Breath Test in Neurologically Impaired Patients – A Focus on the Stomach Function and Morphology

Purpose: We explored factors affecting gastric emptying in neurologically impaired (NI) patients using the 13C-acetate breath test. Methods: Twenty-four NI patients were classified by the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which was treated by fundoplication plus gastrostomy, or the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kurume medical journal 2022/12/31, Vol.69(3.4), pp.227-235
Hauptverfasser: KOMATSUZAKI, NAOKO, HASHIZUME, NAOKI, SAKAMOTO, SAKI, NAKAHARA, HIROTOMO, TSURUHISA, SHIORI, MASUI, DAISUKE, KOGA, YOSHINORI, HIGASHIDATE, NARUKI, SAIKUSA, NOBUYUKI, ISHII, SHINJI, FUKAHORI, SUGURU, YAMASHITA, YUSHIRO, TANAKA, YOSHIAKI, YAGI, MINORU, KAJI, TATSURU
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: We explored factors affecting gastric emptying in neurologically impaired (NI) patients using the 13C-acetate breath test. Methods: Twenty-four NI patients were classified by the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which was treated by fundoplication plus gastrostomy, or the absence of GERD, which was treated by gastrostomy alone, along with gastric malposition involving cascade stomach and organoaxial gastric volvulus (OGV). Gastric emptying parameters (GEPs), which were the emptying half time (T 1/2 , minute), the lag phase time (T lag , minute), and the gastric emptying coefficient (GEC), were measured before and after surgery. We evaluated the relationship between GEPs and GERD, gastric malposition, and surgical intervention. All data were expressed as the median (interquartile range). Results: The T1/2 and GEC of patients with OGV were significantly worse than in those without OGV before surgery (T1/2 with OGV: 241.3 [154.9, 314.3] vs. T1/2 without OGV: 113.7 [105.2, 151.4], p = 0.01, GEC with OGV: 3.19 [2.46, 3.28] vs. GEC without OGV: 3.65 [3.24, 3.90], p = 0.02). GERD and cascade stomach were not associ ated with GEPs. The GEPs of all NI patients showed no significant difference between before and after surgery. The surgical change in T1/2 (ΔT 1/2 ) in the patients with OGV was significantly lower than in those without OGV (ΔT1/2 with OGV: −47.1 [−142.7, −22.1] vs. ΔT1/2 without OGV: −3.78 [−26.6, 12.0], p = 0.03). Conclusion: Stomach malposition, such as OGV, seems to affect gastric emptying and may be improved by surgi cal intervention.
ISSN:0023-5679
1881-2090
DOI:10.2739/kurumemedj.MS6934017