Effect of aggressive vs conservative screening and confirmatory test on time to extubation among patients at low or intermediate risk: a randomized clinical trial

Purpose This study aimed to determine the best strategy to achieve fast and safe extubation. Methods This multicenter trial randomized patients with primary respiratory failure and low-to-intermediate risk for extubation failure with planned high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) preventive therapy. It included four groups: (1) conservative screening with ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 ) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) ≥ 150 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≤ 8 cmH 2 O plus conservative spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with pressure support 5 cmH 2 O + PEEP 0 cmH 2 O); (2) screening with ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO 2 ) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO 2 ) ≥ 150 and PEEP ≤ 8 plus aggressive SBT with pressure support 8 + PEEP 5; (3) aggressive screening with PaO 2 /FiO 2 > 180 and PEEP 10 maintained until the SBT with pressure support 8 + PEEP 5; (4) screening with PaO 2 /FiO 2 > 180 and PEEP 10 maintained until the SBT with pressure support 5 + PEEP 0. Primary outcomes were time-to-extubation and simple weaning rate. Secondary outcomes included reintubation within 7 days after extubation. Results Randomization to the aggressive-aggressive group was discontinued at the interim analysis for safety reasons. Thus, 884 patients who underwent at least 1 SBT were analyzed (conservative-conservative group, n = 256; conservative-aggressive group, n = 267; aggressive-conservative group, n = 261; aggressive-aggressive, n = 100). Median time to extubation was lower in the groups with aggressive screening (p