Simultaneous Detection of Prolactin and Growth Hormone Using a Dual-label Time-resolved Fluorescence Immunoassay

Prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) are two important hormones secreted by the pituitary gland, and their abnormal levels are often related to disease status. This study aimed to establish a new dual-label time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) to quantitatively measure PRL and GH levels...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of fluorescence 2024-02
Hauptverfasser: Zhong, Shuhai, Liang, Huankun, Peng, Fenglan, Lu, Yanhong, Liu, Tiancai, Kulchytski, Uladzimir, Dong, Wenqi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) are two important hormones secreted by the pituitary gland, and their abnormal levels are often related to disease status. This study aimed to establish a new dual-label time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) to quantitatively measure PRL and GH levels in serum. A sandwich TRFIA was optimized and established: anti-PRL/GH antibodies immobilized on 96-well plates captured PRL/GH and then banded together with anti-PRL/GH paired antibodies labeled with europium(III) (Eu )/samarium(III) (Sm ) chelates. Finally, a time-resolved analyzer measured the Eu /Sm fluorescence values. Clinical serum samples were used to evaluate the detection performance of this method. The sensitivities of this dual-label TRFIA were 0.35 ng/mL and 0.45 ng/mL, respectively, and the detection range was between 0.1 and 1000 ng/mL. All the cross-reactivities were lower than 1.07%. The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were 2.18-7.85% and 2.25-7.30%, respectively. Compared with the registered TRFIA kits, a high Pearson coefficient (r = 0.9626 and 0.9675) was observed. This dual-label TRFIA has high sensitivity, accuracy and specificity with good clinical detection performance, representing a suitable alternative to existing methods for determining PRL and GH levels, and is expected to be used in the clinic in the future.
ISSN:1053-0509
1573-4994
DOI:10.1007/s10895-023-03395-w