Automatic early detection of induced colic in horses using accelerometer devices

Background To seek appropriate veterinary attention for horses with colic, owners must recognise early signs. Direct observation of horse behaviour has several drawbacks: it is time‐consuming, hard to see subtle and common behavioural signs, and is based on intuition and subjective decisions. Due to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Equine veterinary journal 2024-11, Vol.56 (6), p.1229-1242
Hauptverfasser: Eerdekens, Anniek, Papas, Marion, Damiaans, Bert, Martens, Luc, Govaere, Jan, Joseph, Wout, Deruyck, Margot
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To seek appropriate veterinary attention for horses with colic, owners must recognise early signs. Direct observation of horse behaviour has several drawbacks: it is time‐consuming, hard to see subtle and common behavioural signs, and is based on intuition and subjective decisions. Due to recent advances in wearables and artificial intelligence, it may be possible to develop diagnostic software that can automatically detect colic signs. Objectives To develop a software algorithm to aid in the detection of colic signs and levels of pain. Study design In vivo experiments. Methods Transient colic was induced in eight experimental mares with luteolytic doses of prostaglandin. Veterinarians observed the horses before and throughout the interventions and assigned pain scores which were used to separate colic episodes into none (pain score ≤5), level 1 (pain score 6–10) or level 2 (pain score ≥11). Accelerometric data and videos were collected throughout the experiments and using accelerometric data, the horse's behaviour was classified into normal and 10 pain‐related behaviours and an activity index was calculated. Models were designed that utilised behaviour and activity index characteristics both detecting the presence of colic and assessing its severity. To determine the accuracy of the model, the ground truth, that is the veterinarians' observation of colic signs and assessment of pain level, was compared with the automatic detection system. Results The cross‐validation analysis demonstrated an accuracy of 91.2% for detecting colic and an accuracy of 93.8% in differentiating between level 1 colic and level 2 colic. The model was able to accurately classify 10 pain‐related behaviours and distinguish them from normal behaviour with a high accuracy. Main limitations We included a limited number of horses with severe pain related behaviours in the dataset. This constraint affects the accuracy of categorising colic severity rather than limiting the algorithms' capacity to identify early colic signs. Conclusions Our system for early detection of colic in horses is unique and innovative, and it can distinguish between colic of varying severity. Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Um Pferde mit Koliken angemessen tierärztlich behandeln zu lassen, müssen Tierbesitzer frühe Anzeichen erkennen. Die direkte Beobachtung des Pferdeverhaltens birgt einige Nachteile: sie ist zeitaufwendig, es ist schwierig, subtile Verhaltenssymptome zu erkennen, und oftmals basiert die
ISSN:0425-1644
2042-3306
2042-3306
DOI:10.1111/evj.14069