Required Mental Health Evaluation Before Initiating Gender-Affirming Hormones: Trans and Nonbinary Perspectives
Purpose: Gender-affirming hormones (hormones)—the use of sex hormones to induce desired secondary sex characteristics in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals—are vital health care for many TGNB people. Some hormone providers require a letter from a mental health provider before hormone initi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transgender health 2024-02, Vol.9 (1), p.34-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose:
Gender-affirming hormones (hormones)—the use of sex hormones to induce desired secondary sex characteristics in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals—are vital health care for many TGNB people. Some hormone providers require a letter from a mental health provider before hormone initiation. We explore the perspectives of TGNB individuals regarding the impact of the letter requirement on their experience of care.
Methods:
We conducted semistructured interviews with 21 TGNB individuals who have sought or are receiving hormones. We purposively sampled respondents who were (
n
=12) and were not (
n
=8) required to provide a letter. An Advisory Board of transgender individuals guided the methodology. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded both inductively and deductively.
Results:
We identified three themes related to the letter requirement: (1) Mental health: While participants appreciated the importance of therapy, the letter requirement did not serve this purpose; (2) Trans identity: The process of obtaining a letter created doubt in participants' own transness, along with a resistance to the pathologization and conflation of mental illness with transness; and (3) Care relationships: The letter requirement negatively impacted the patient-provider relationship. Participants felt the need to self-censor or to perform a version of transness they thought the provider expected; this process decreased their trust in care professionals.
Conclusion:
A letter requirement did not improve mental health and had several negative consequences. Removal of this requirement will improve access to hormones and may paradoxically improve mental health. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2688-4887 2380-193X |
DOI: | 10.1089/trgh.2022.0024 |