Single axonal characterization of trigeminocerebellar projection patterns in the mouse

The cerebellar projection from the trigeminal nuclear complex is one of the major populations of the cerebellar inputs. Although this projection is essential in cerebellar functional processing and organization, its morphological organization has not been systematically clarified. The present study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of comparative neurology (1911) 2024-01, Vol.532 (1), p.e25581-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Tianzhuo, Numata, Naoyuki, Ji, Qing, Mizuno, Yuma, Viet, Nguyen‐Minh, Luo, Yuanjun, Chao, Yuhan, Panezai, Saddam Khan, Sugihara, Izumi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The cerebellar projection from the trigeminal nuclear complex is one of the major populations of the cerebellar inputs. Although this projection is essential in cerebellar functional processing and organization, its morphological organization has not been systematically clarified. The present study addressed this issue by lobule‐specific retrograde neuronal labeling and single axonal reconstruction with anterograde labeling. The cerebellar projection arose mainly from the interpolaris subdivision of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5I) and the principal trigeminal sensory nucleus (Pr5). Although crus II, paramedian lobule, lobule IX, and simple lobule were the major targets, paraflocculus, and other lobules received some projections. Reconstructed single trigeminocerebellar axons showed 77.8 mossy fiber terminals on average often in multiple lobules but no nuclear collaterals. More terminals were located in zebrin‐negative or lightly‐positive compartments than in zebrin‐positive compartments. While Pr5 axons predominantly projected to ipsilateral crus II, Sp5I axons projected either predominantly to crus II and paramedian lobule often bilaterally, or predominantly to lobule IX always ipsilaterally. Lobule IX‐predominant‐type Sp5I neurons specifically expressed Gpr26. Gpr26‐tagged neuronal labeling produced a peculiar mossy fiber distribution, which was dense in the dorsolateral lobule IX and extending transversely to the dorsal median apex in lobule IX. The projection to the cerebellar nuclei was observed in collaterals of ascending Sp5I axons that project to the diencephalon. In sum, multiple populations of trigeminocerebellar projections showed divergent projections to cerebellar lobules. The projection was generally complementary with the pontine projection and partly matched with the reported orofacial receptive field arrangement. Single‐axon analysis indicated two types of axonal populations in the trigeminocerebellar projection from the pars interpolaris of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (left). One type overlapped with Gpr26‐positive axons. Their projection patterns can partly explain the fractured patchy arrangement of orofacial receptive fields in cerebellar lobules (right).
ISSN:0021-9967
1096-9861
DOI:10.1002/cne.25581